The inequality of gender equality indices
The World Economic Forum meeting is on this week. Isn’t it interesting that WEF’s gender equality index for education attainment is 1 in OECD countries [1] where far more women than men now graduate from college, and in many of which girls far outpace boys in school? In the US for instance, 50% more women have tertiary degrees than men(Marano, 2015 [2]), and 17-year old boys have, on average, the reading skill of 13-year old girls (Sommers, 2014). Even in Brazil, that is also the case (Ministry of Education, Brazil, 2015 [3]). Why is then that the index does not exceed 1? Because it is arbitrarily capped at 1 (p. 6). Apparently, gender gaps only exist when it disadvantages women, not men.
It’s the same old fallacy of feminism:
“seeking to establish equal opportunities… for women” – ay? 0.o
How can equality hold for only one side?? Emma Watson explained that quite clearly in her speech at the UN (Watson, 2014 [5]). Or did she?
“Feminism is equality between the sexes.
Men don’t have the benefits of equality either.
So… HeForShe, peeps.” (tongue-in-cheek)
[1] World Economic Forum, “The Global Gender Gap Report”, 2015.
[2] Hara Estroff Marano, “The Mating Game Is Changing —And You Won’t Believe How”, Psychology Today, 26.10.2015.
[3] Ministry of Education, Brazil, “Mulheres são maioria no ingresso e na conclusão de cursos superiores”, Portal Brasil, 8.03.2015.
[4] Mike Buchanan, “Male suicide scandal: UK men are paying for a system that drives thousands of them to death”, International Business Times, 24.03.2015.
[5] Emma Watson, Speech, UN, 20.09.2014.
O post The inequality of gender equality indices apareceu primeiro em O Contráditorio.
Comentários
Postar um comentário